IBRD only vs Samoa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia over time
- IBRD only
- Samoa
How they compare
IBRD only currently reports 492.24 million current US$ against 43.58 million current US$ in Samoa, a difference of 448.66 million current US$.
That makes IBRD only's figure about 11.3 times Samoa's.
Across all 53 years both countries report, IBRD only has been ahead every year.
IBRD only ranks 15th and Samoa ranks 13th of 47 groups.
IBRD only has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 56.81 million current US$ | 2.17 million current US$ | 54.64 million current US$ | IBRD only |
| 1980s | 138.99 million current US$ | 5.21 million current US$ | 133.78 million current US$ | IBRD only |
| 1990s | 266.60 million current US$ | 8.79 million current US$ | 257.81 million current US$ | IBRD only |
| 2000s | 466.24 million current US$ | 11.47 million current US$ | 454.76 million current US$ | IBRD only |
| 2010s | 697.48 million current US$ | 32.08 million current US$ | 665.40 million current US$ | IBRD only |
| 2020s | 481.70 million current US$ | 32.49 million current US$ | 449.21 million current US$ | IBRD only |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia, IBRD only or Samoa?
- IBRD only, at 492.24 million current US$ against 43.58 million current US$ in Samoa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia between IBRD only and Samoa?
- 448.66 million current US$, with IBRD only ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Samoa?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
- How do IBRD only and Samoa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia?
- IBRD only ranks 15th and Samoa ranks 13th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.