Uganda vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia

Uganda
3.32 million current US$
in 2023
Zimbabwe
4.22 million current US$
in 2023
Uganda rank
41st
Zimbabwe rank
39th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia over time

  • Uganda
  • Zimbabwe
020.0M40.0M60.0M196519942023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 4.22 million current US$ against 3.32 million current US$ in Uganda, a difference of 896,620 current US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Uganda ranks 41st and Zimbabwe ranks 39th of 163 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Uganda averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Uganda Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 78,000 current US$ 28,000 current US$ 50,000 current US$ Uganda
1970s 380,000 current US$ 190,000 current US$ 190,000 current US$ Uganda
1980s 1.90 million current US$ 3.05 million current US$ 1.15 million current US$ Zimbabwe
1990s 1.17 million current US$ 4.97 million current US$ 3.80 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 1.24 million current US$ 7.04 million current US$ 5.79 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 4.61 million current US$ 21.24 million current US$ 16.63 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 3.13 million current US$ 2.86 million current US$ 267,105 current US$ Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia, Uganda or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 4.22 million current US$ against 3.32 million current US$ in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia between Uganda and Zimbabwe?
896,620 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Zimbabwe?
50 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Uganda and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia?
Uganda ranks 41st and Zimbabwe ranks 39th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
210 places, 7,317 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.