Barbados vs Malta: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps
Barbados
10,000 current US$
in 1999
Malta
10,000 current US$
in 2001
Barbados rank
145th
Malta rank
145th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps over time
- Barbados
- Malta
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 10,000 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Malta, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Malta ahead.
Barbados ranks 145th and Malta ranks 145th of 154 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 10,000 current US$ | 46,250 current US$ | 36,250 current US$ | Malta |
| 1990s | 11,000 current US$ | 299,000 current US$ | 288,000 current US$ | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps, Barbados or Malta?
- Barbados, at 10,000 current US$ against 10,000 current US$ in Malta as of 1999.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps between Barbados and Malta?
- 0 current US$, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Malta?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 1999.
- How do Barbados and Malta rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps?
- Barbados ranks 145th and Malta ranks 145th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) with 389 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.