Brazil vs Romania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps over time
- Brazil
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 4.04 million current US$ against 3.62 million current US$ in Brazil, a difference of 415,780 current US$.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Romania ahead.
Brazil ranks 38th and Romania ranks 36th of 154 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.27 million current US$ | 9.28 million current US$ | 7.01 million current US$ | Romania |
| 2000s | 1.73 million current US$ | 3.70 million current US$ | 1.97 million current US$ | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps, Brazil or Romania?
- Romania, at 4.04 million current US$ against 3.62 million current US$ in Brazil as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps between Brazil and Romania?
- 415,780 current US$, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Romania?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Brazil and Romania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps?
- Brazil ranks 38th and Romania ranks 36th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) with 389 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.