China vs Georgia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps

China
8.63 million current US$
in 2023
Georgia
8.78 million current US$
in 2023
China rank
20th
Georgia rank
19th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps over time

  • China
  • Georgia
-50.0M-25.0M025.0M50.0M197920012023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 8.78 million current US$ against 8.63 million current US$ in China, a difference of 147,080 current US$.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was China ahead.

China ranks 20th and Georgia ranks 19th of 154 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Georgia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s -3.81 million current US$ 333,333 current US$ 4.15 million current US$ Georgia
2000s 9.50 million current US$ 7.65 million current US$ 1.84 million current US$ China
2010s 11.81 million current US$ 4.76 million current US$ 7.06 million current US$ China
2020s 6.88 million current US$ 6.91 million current US$ 23,795 current US$ Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps, China or Georgia?
Georgia, at 8.78 million current US$ against 8.63 million current US$ in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps between China and Georgia?
147,080 current US$, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Georgia?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do China and Georgia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps?
China ranks 20th and Georgia ranks 19th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Georgia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-gaps-filled/china/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-gaps-filled/china/georgia/">China vs Georgia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 8,505 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) with 389 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.