China vs Least developed countries: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps

China
8.63 million current US$
in 2023
Least developed countries
92.13 million current US$
in 2022
China rank
20th
Least developed countries rank
17th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps over time

  • China
  • Least developed countries
-100.0M0100.0M200.0M197019962023

How they compare

Least developed countries currently reports 92.13 million current US$ against 8.63 million current US$ in China, a difference of 83.50 million current US$.

That makes Least developed countries's figure about 10.7 times China's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Least developed countries ahead.

China ranks 20th and Least developed countries ranks 17th of 154 countries.

Least developed countries has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Least developed countries Difference Ahead
1970s 110,000 current US$ 5.06 million current US$ 4.95 million current US$ Least developed countries
1980s 7.18 million current US$ 15.22 million current US$ 8.05 million current US$ Least developed countries
1990s 2.23 million current US$ 59.23 million current US$ 57.01 million current US$ Least developed countries
2000s 9.50 million current US$ 80.47 million current US$ 70.97 million current US$ Least developed countries
2010s 11.81 million current US$ 87.67 million current US$ 75.86 million current US$ Least developed countries
2020s 6.30 million current US$ 78.49 million current US$ 72.19 million current US$ Least developed countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps, China or Least developed countries?
Least developed countries, at 92.13 million current US$ against 8.63 million current US$ in China as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps between China and Least developed countries?
83.50 million current US$, with Least developed countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Least developed countries?
44 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2022.
How do China and Least developed countries rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps?
China ranks 20th and Least developed countries ranks 17th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Least developed countries: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-gaps-filled/china/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-gaps-filled/china/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">China vs Least developed countries: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 8,505 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) with 389 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.