China vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps

China
8.63 million current US$
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
57.53 million current US$
in 2022
China rank
20th
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
23rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps over time

  • China
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
0200.0M400.0M600.0M197019962023

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) currently reports 57.53 million current US$ against 8.63 million current US$ in China, a difference of 48.90 million current US$.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)'s figure about 6.7 times China's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.

China ranks 20th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 23rd of 154 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1970s 110,000 current US$ 10.62 million current US$ 10.51 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
1980s 7.18 million current US$ 19.97 million current US$ 12.79 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
1990s 2.23 million current US$ 69.12 million current US$ 66.89 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
2000s 9.50 million current US$ 181.64 million current US$ 172.15 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
2010s 11.81 million current US$ 82.06 million current US$ 70.25 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
2020s 6.30 million current US$ 63.41 million current US$ 57.12 million current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps, China or Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), at 57.53 million current US$ against 8.63 million current US$ in China as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps between China and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
48.90 million current US$, with Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
44 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2022.
How do China and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps?
China ranks 20th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 23rd of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-gaps-filled/china/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-gaps-filled/china/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">China vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 8,505 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) with 389 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.