Croatia vs East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps

Croatia
5.74 million current US$
in 2010
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
24.48 million current US$
in 2022
Croatia rank
29th
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
32nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps over time

  • Croatia
  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
-50.0M050.0M100.0M150.0M197019962022

How they compare

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) currently reports 24.48 million current US$ against 5.74 million current US$ in Croatia, a difference of 18.74 million current US$.

That makes East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s figure about 4.3 times Croatia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 29th and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 32nd of 154 countries.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1990s 6.40 million current US$ 9.63 million current US$ 3.23 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
2000s 5.49 million current US$ 20.62 million current US$ 15.13 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
2010s 5.74 million current US$ 25.55 million current US$ 19.81 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps, Croatia or East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), at 24.48 million current US$ against 5.74 million current US$ in Croatia as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps between Croatia and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
18.74 million current US$, with East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
17 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2010.
How do Croatia and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps?
Croatia ranks 29th and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 32nd of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-gaps-filled/croatia/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-gaps-filled/croatia/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Croatia vs East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 8,505 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) with 389 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.