Cuba vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps
Cuba
142,165 current US$
in 2023
Latvia
110,000 current US$
in 2004
Cuba rank
102nd
Latvia rank
105th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps over time
- Cuba
- Latvia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 142,165 current US$ against 110,000 current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 32,165 current US$.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.3 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 102nd and Latvia ranks 105th of 154 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 136,250 current US$ | 72,500 current US$ | 63,750 current US$ | Cuba |
| 2000s | 126,000 current US$ | 114,000 current US$ | 12,000 current US$ | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps, Cuba or Latvia?
- Cuba, at 142,165 current US$ against 110,000 current US$ in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps between Cuba and Latvia?
- 32,165 current US$, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Latvia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do Cuba and Latvia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps?
- Cuba ranks 102nd and Latvia ranks 105th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) with 389 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.