Czechia vs East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps

Czechia
5.70 million current US$
in 2004
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
24.48 million current US$
in 2022
Czechia rank
30th
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
32nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps over time

  • Czechia
  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
-50.0M050.0M100.0M150.0M197019962022

How they compare

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) currently reports 24.48 million current US$ against 5.70 million current US$ in Czechia, a difference of 18.78 million current US$.

That makes East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s figure about 4.3 times Czechia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.

Czechia ranks 30th and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 32nd of 154 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1990s 7.14 million current US$ 3.51 million current US$ 3.64 million current US$ Czechia
2000s 4.16 million current US$ 15.60 million current US$ 11.44 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps, Czechia or East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), at 24.48 million current US$ against 5.70 million current US$ in Czechia as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps between Czechia and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
18.78 million current US$, with East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
How do Czechia and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps?
Czechia ranks 30th and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 32nd of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-gaps-filled/czechia/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-gaps-filled/czechia/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Czechia vs East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 8,505 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) with 389 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.