Czechia vs Jordan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps over time
- Czechia
- Jordan
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 5.70 million current US$ against 4.83 million current US$ in Jordan, a difference of 866,220 current US$.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.2 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 30th and Jordan ranks 33rd of 154 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.14 million current US$ | 173,000 current US$ | 6.97 million current US$ | Czechia |
| 2000s | 4.16 million current US$ | 290,000 current US$ | 3.87 million current US$ | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps, Czechia or Jordan?
- Czechia, at 5.70 million current US$ against 4.83 million current US$ in Jordan as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps between Czechia and Jordan?
- 866,220 current US$, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Jordan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Czechia and Jordan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps?
- Czechia ranks 30th and Jordan ranks 33rd of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) with 389 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.