Euro area vs Russia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria … Austria gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria … Austria gaps over time
- Euro area
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 22.99 million current US$ against 9.91 million current US$ in Euro area, a difference of 13.08 million current US$.
That makes Russia's figure about 2.3 times Euro area's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Euro area ahead.
Euro area ranks 1st and Russia ranks 4th of 2 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Euro area averaged higher in 1 and Russia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Euro area | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.67 million current US$ | 1.72 million current US$ | 5.95 million current US$ | Euro area |
| 2000s | 9.06 million current US$ | 10.06 million current US$ | 998,000 current US$ | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps, Euro area or Russia?
- Russia, at 22.99 million current US$ against 9.91 million current US$ in Euro area as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps between Euro area and Russia?
- 13.08 million current US$, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Russia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Euro area and Russia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps?
- Euro area ranks 1st and Russia ranks 4th of 2 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) with 389 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.