Hong Kong, China vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps

Hong Kong, China
70,000 current US$
in 1996
Zimbabwe
75,834 current US$
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
112th
Zimbabwe rank
111th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Zimbabwe
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M10.0M196519942023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 75,834 current US$ against 70,000 current US$ in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 5,834 current US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 112th and Zimbabwe ranks 111th of 154 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 26,667 current US$ 25,000 current US$ 1,667 current US$ Hong Kong, China
1980s 128,500 current US$ 388,000 current US$ 259,500 current US$ Zimbabwe
1990s 38,571 current US$ 2.64 million current US$ 2.60 million current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps, Hong Kong, China or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 75,834 current US$ against 70,000 current US$ in Hong Kong, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps between Hong Kong, China and Zimbabwe?
5,834 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Zimbabwe?
20 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 1996.
How do Hong Kong, China and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps?
Hong Kong, China ranks 112th and Zimbabwe ranks 111th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-gaps-filled/hong-kong-sar-china/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-gaps-filled/hong-kong-sar-china/zimbabwe/">Hong Kong, China vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 8,505 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) with 389 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.