Mali vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps

Mali
2.88 million current US$
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
3.00 million current US$
in 2023
Mali rank
46th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
44th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps over time

  • Mali
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
010.0M20.0M30.0M196219922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 3.00 million current US$ against 2.88 million current US$ in Mali, a difference of 128,770 current US$.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Mali ranks 46th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 44th of 154 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 10,000 current US$ 50,000 current US$ 40,000 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1970s 143,333 current US$ 266,667 current US$ 123,333 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 139,000 current US$ 1.82 million current US$ 1.68 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 265,000 current US$ 6.81 million current US$ 6.54 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 105,000 current US$ 6.59 million current US$ 6.48 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 615,917 current US$ 1.55 million current US$ 938,567 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 1.72 million current US$ 1.74 million current US$ 23,964 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps, Mali or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 3.00 million current US$ against 2.88 million current US$ in Mali as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps between Mali and Tanzania, United Republic of?
128,770 current US$, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Tanzania, United Republic of?
48 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Mali and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps?
Mali ranks 46th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 44th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-gaps-filled/mali/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-gaps-filled/mali/tanzania/">Mali vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 8,505 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) with 389 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.