Nigeria vs Romania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps over time
- Nigeria
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 4.04 million current US$ against 3.59 million current US$ in Nigeria, a difference of 447,190 current US$.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Romania ahead.
Nigeria ranks 39th and Romania ranks 36th of 154 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Nigeria averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.94 million current US$ | 9.28 million current US$ | 7.34 million current US$ | Romania |
| 2000s | 3.91 million current US$ | 3.70 million current US$ | 210,000 current US$ | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps, Nigeria or Romania?
- Romania, at 4.04 million current US$ against 3.59 million current US$ in Nigeria as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps between Nigeria and Romania?
- 447,190 current US$, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Romania?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Nigeria and Romania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps?
- Nigeria ranks 39th and Romania ranks 36th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) with 389 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.