Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps
Suriname
78,909 current US$
in 2017
Zimbabwe
75,834 current US$
in 2023
Suriname rank
110th
Zimbabwe rank
111th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps over time
- Suriname
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 78,909 current US$ against 75,834 current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3,075 current US$.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Suriname ranks 110th and Zimbabwe ranks 111th of 154 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20,000 current US$ | 680,000 current US$ | 660,000 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 81,428 current US$ | 319,046 current US$ | 237,618 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps, Suriname or Zimbabwe?
- Suriname, at 78,909 current US$ against 75,834 current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2017.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps between Suriname and Zimbabwe?
- 3,075 current US$, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2017.
- How do Suriname and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), gaps?
- Suriname ranks 110th and Zimbabwe ranks 111th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) with 389 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.