Central Europe and the Baltics vs Croatia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per

Central Europe and the Baltics
5.2 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Croatia
102.57 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
15th
Croatia rank
16th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Croatia
0100200300199020002010

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 102.57 current US$ per square kilometre against 5.2 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 97.37 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Croatia's figure about 19.7 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 15th and Croatia ranks 16th of 44 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 1 and Croatia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Croatia Difference Ahead
1990s 160.43 current US$ per square kilometre 114.36 current US$ per square kilometre 46.07 current US$ per square kilometre Central Europe and the Baltics
2000s 65.84 current US$ per square kilometre 98.15 current US$ per square kilometre 32.31 current US$ per square kilometre Croatia
2010s 5.2 current US$ per square kilometre 102.57 current US$ per square kilometre 97.37 current US$ per square kilometre Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per, Central Europe and the Baltics or Croatia?
Croatia, at 102.57 current US$ per square kilometre against 5.2 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2010.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per between Central Europe and the Baltics and Croatia?
97.37 current US$ per square kilometre, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Croatia?
17 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2010.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Croatia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 15th and Croatia ranks 16th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Croatia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/croatia/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Croatia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 7,987 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.