Ecuador vs India: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per

Ecuador
3.66 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
India
4.35 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
77th
India rank
74th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per over time

  • Ecuador
  • India
-1001020196319932023

How they compare

India currently reports 4.35 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.66 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.69 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes India's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 77th and India ranks 74th of 153 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 4 and India in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador India Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7104 current US$ per square kilometre 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4466 current US$ per square kilometre India
1970s 0.885 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5423 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3426 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.7694 current US$ per square kilometre 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3126 current US$ per square kilometre India
1990s 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre -0.3027 current US$ per square kilometre 2.1 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre -0.3219 current US$ per square kilometre 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 4.04 current US$ per square kilometre 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre 2.95 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 2.57 current US$ per square kilometre 3.9 current US$ per square kilometre 1.33 current US$ per square kilometre India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per, Ecuador or India?
India, at 4.35 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.66 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per between Ecuador and India?
0.69 current US$ per square kilometre, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and India?
54 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and India rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
Ecuador ranks 77th and India ranks 74th of 153 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs India: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/india/">Ecuador vs India: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 7,987 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.