Ecuador vs Senegal: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per

Ecuador
3.66 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Senegal
4.33 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
77th
Senegal rank
75th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per over time

  • Ecuador
  • Senegal
0510152025196319932023

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 4.33 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.66 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.67 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Senegal's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Senegal ahead.

Ecuador ranks 77th and Senegal ranks 75th of 153 countries.

Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Senegal Difference Ahead
1960s -0.903 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1558 current US$ per square kilometre 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre Senegal
1970s 0.885 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9219 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0369 current US$ per square kilometre Senegal
1980s 0.7694 current US$ per square kilometre 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre Senegal
1990s 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre 11.86 current US$ per square kilometre 10.06 current US$ per square kilometre Senegal
2000s 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre 14.38 current US$ per square kilometre 12.81 current US$ per square kilometre Senegal
2010s 4.04 current US$ per square kilometre 8.93 current US$ per square kilometre 4.89 current US$ per square kilometre Senegal
2020s 2.57 current US$ per square kilometre 3.6 current US$ per square kilometre 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre Senegal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per, Ecuador or Senegal?
Senegal, at 4.33 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.66 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per between Ecuador and Senegal?
0.67 current US$ per square kilometre, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Senegal?
49 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Senegal rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
Ecuador ranks 77th and Senegal ranks 75th of 153 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Senegal: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/senegal/">Ecuador vs Senegal: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 7,987 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.