Gambia vs High income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per

Gambia
16.73 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
High income
0.0063 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
45th
High income rank
44th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per over time

  • Gambia
  • High income
-5000500196119922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 16.73 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0063 current US$ per square kilometre in High income, a difference of 16.72 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 2,644.2 times High income's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 45th and High income ranks 44th of 153 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 5 and High income in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia High income Difference Ahead
1970s 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre 0.036 current US$ per square kilometre 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 2.67 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1272 current US$ per square kilometre 2.54 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 132.41 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3341 current US$ per square kilometre 132.08 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2000s -101.58 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1316 current US$ per square kilometre 101.71 current US$ per square kilometre High income
2010s 0.1856 current US$ per square kilometre 0.008 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1776 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 12.99 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0064 current US$ per square kilometre 12.98 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per, Gambia or High income?
Gambia, at 16.73 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.0063 current US$ per square kilometre in High income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per between Gambia and High income?
16.72 current US$ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and High income?
47 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Gambia and High income rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
Gambia ranks 45th and High income ranks 44th of 153 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs High income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/high-income/">Gambia vs High income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 7,987 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.