Gambia vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per

Gambia
16.73 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
0.9014 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Gambia rank
45th
OECD members rank
42nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per over time

  • Gambia
  • OECD members
-5000500197019962023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 16.73 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.9014 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 15.83 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 18.6 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 45th and OECD members ranks 42nd of 153 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 4 and OECD members in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1391 current US$ per square kilometre 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 2.67 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4515 current US$ per square kilometre 2.22 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 132.41 current US$ per square kilometre 5.75 current US$ per square kilometre 126.66 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2000s -101.58 current US$ per square kilometre 2.33 current US$ per square kilometre 103.91 current US$ per square kilometre OECD members
2010s 0.1856 current US$ per square kilometre 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8565 current US$ per square kilometre OECD members
2020s 11.74 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9688 current US$ per square kilometre 10.77 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per, Gambia or OECD members?
Gambia, at 16.73 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.9014 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per between Gambia and OECD members?
15.83 current US$ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and OECD members?
46 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2022.
How do Gambia and OECD members rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
Gambia ranks 45th and OECD members ranks 42nd of 153 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/oecd-members/">Gambia vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 7,987 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.