Guatemala vs Türkiye: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per

Guatemala
48.78 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Türkiye
46.45 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
26th
Türkiye rank
28th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per over time

  • Guatemala
  • Türkiye
0204060196219922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 48.78 current US$ per square kilometre against 46.45 current US$ per square kilometre in Türkiye, a difference of 2.33 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Türkiye's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 26th and Türkiye ranks 28th of 153 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 6 and Türkiye in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Türkiye Difference Ahead
1960s 3.59 current US$ per square kilometre 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre 2.29 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 2.89 current US$ per square kilometre 2.22 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6684 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 13.8 current US$ per square kilometre 17.57 current US$ per square kilometre 3.77 current US$ per square kilometre Türkiye
1990s 43.63 current US$ per square kilometre 9.86 current US$ per square kilometre 33.76 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 54.05 current US$ per square kilometre 25.67 current US$ per square kilometre 28.38 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 49.86 current US$ per square kilometre 42.39 current US$ per square kilometre 7.47 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 49.45 current US$ per square kilometre 37.8 current US$ per square kilometre 11.66 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per, Guatemala or Türkiye?
Guatemala, at 48.78 current US$ per square kilometre against 46.45 current US$ per square kilometre in Türkiye as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per between Guatemala and Türkiye?
2.33 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Türkiye?
60 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Türkiye rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
Guatemala ranks 26th and Türkiye ranks 28th of 153 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Türkiye: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/turkiye/">Guatemala vs Türkiye: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 7,987 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.