Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per

Guinea-Bissau
0.2418 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Zimbabwe
0.196 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
135th
Zimbabwe rank
138th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Zimbabwe
010203040197119972023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.2418 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.196 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0458 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 135th and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 153 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 5.09 current US$ per square kilometre 1 current US$ per square kilometre 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1990s 9.14 current US$ per square kilometre 6.26 current US$ per square kilometre 2.88 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 2.81 current US$ per square kilometre 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8208 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 2.92 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8924 current US$ per square kilometre 2.03 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.1562 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5931 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4369 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per, Guinea-Bissau or Zimbabwe?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0.2418 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.196 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per between Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe?
0.0458 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe?
36 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2021.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 135th and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 153 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/zimbabwe/">Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 7,987 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.