Hong Kong, China vs Lower middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per

Hong Kong, China
66.67 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
Lower middle income
4.4 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
23rd
Lower middle income rank
23rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Lower middle income
0200400196119922023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 66.67 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.4 current US$ per square kilometre in Lower middle income, a difference of 62.27 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 15.1 times Lower middle income's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 23rd and Lower middle income ranks 23rd of 153 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Lower middle income Difference Ahead
1960s 68.63 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8806 current US$ per square kilometre 67.75 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1970s 26.67 current US$ per square kilometre 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre 23.5 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1980s 117.74 current US$ per square kilometre 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre 115.66 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1990s 37.97 current US$ per square kilometre 1.72 current US$ per square kilometre 36.25 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per, Hong Kong, China or Lower middle income?
Hong Kong, China, at 66.67 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.4 current US$ per square kilometre in Lower middle income as of 1996.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per between Hong Kong, China and Lower middle income?
62.27 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Lower middle income?
21 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 1996.
How do Hong Kong, China and Lower middle income rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
Hong Kong, China ranks 23rd and Lower middle income ranks 23rd of 153 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Lower middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/lower-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/lower-middle-income/">Hong Kong, China vs Lower middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 7,987 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.