Hong Kong, China vs Singapore: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per

Hong Kong, China
66.67 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
Singapore
74.63 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1995
Hong Kong, China rank
23rd
Singapore rank
21st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Singapore
-500-2500250500196519801996

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 74.63 current US$ per square kilometre against 66.67 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 7.96 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Singapore ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 23rd and Singapore ranks 21st of 153 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Singapore Difference Ahead
1970s 10 current US$ per square kilometre 14.93 current US$ per square kilometre 4.93 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 145.61 current US$ per square kilometre 46.91 current US$ per square kilometre 98.7 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1990s 33.19 current US$ per square kilometre 74.63 current US$ per square kilometre 41.44 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per, Hong Kong, China or Singapore?
Singapore, at 74.63 current US$ per square kilometre against 66.67 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China as of 1995.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per between Hong Kong, China and Singapore?
7.96 current US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Singapore?
14 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 1995.
How do Hong Kong, China and Singapore rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
Hong Kong, China ranks 23rd and Singapore ranks 21st of 153 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Singapore: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/singapore/">Hong Kong, China vs Singapore: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 7,987 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.