Mozambique vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per

Mozambique
16.1 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
14.45 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique rank
46th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
48th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per over time

  • Mozambique
  • Sao Tome and Principe
020406080196319932023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 16.1 current US$ per square kilometre against 14.45 current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 1.65 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Mozambique ranks 46th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 48th of 153 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1980s 2.11 current US$ per square kilometre 72.92 current US$ per square kilometre 70.81 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 10.57 current US$ per square kilometre 10.42 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1555 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2010s 9.91 current US$ per square kilometre 11.13 current US$ per square kilometre 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 13.98 current US$ per square kilometre 9.95 current US$ per square kilometre 4.04 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per, Mozambique or Sao Tome and Principe?
Mozambique, at 16.1 current US$ per square kilometre against 14.45 current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per between Mozambique and Sao Tome and Principe?
1.65 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Sao Tome and Principe?
18 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
Mozambique ranks 46th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 48th of 153 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/sao-tome-and-principe/">Mozambique vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 7,987 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.