Singapore vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per

Singapore
74.63 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1995
Sub-Saharan Africa
5.09 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore rank
21st
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
19th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per over time

  • Singapore
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
-500-2500250500196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 74.63 current US$ per square kilometre against 5.09 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 69.54 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 14.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Singapore ahead.

Singapore ranks 21st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 19th of 153 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 253.73 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1077 current US$ per square kilometre 253.62 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1970s 14.93 current US$ per square kilometre 0.7818 current US$ per square kilometre 14.14 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 48.51 current US$ per square kilometre 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre 47.49 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 74.63 current US$ per square kilometre 3.39 current US$ per square kilometre 71.23 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per, Singapore or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Singapore, at 74.63 current US$ per square kilometre against 5.09 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 1995.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per between Singapore and Sub-Saharan Africa?
69.54 current US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Sub-Saharan Africa?
17 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 1995.
How do Singapore and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
Singapore ranks 21st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 19th of 153 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/singapore/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/singapore/sub-saharan-africa/">Singapore vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 7,987 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.