Uruguay vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per

Uruguay
0.1627 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Zimbabwe
0.196 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay rank
141st
Zimbabwe rank
138th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per over time

  • Uruguay
  • Zimbabwe
01020196419932023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.196 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.1627 current US$ per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0333 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Uruguay ahead.

Uruguay ranks 141st and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 153 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Uruguay Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 0.12 current US$ per square kilometre 1 current US$ per square kilometre 0.883 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.2971 current US$ per square kilometre 6.26 current US$ per square kilometre 5.96 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.1143 current US$ per square kilometre 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre 1.78 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.1337 current US$ per square kilometre 0.676 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5424 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per, Uruguay or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.196 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.1627 current US$ per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per between Uruguay and Zimbabwe?
0.0333 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Uruguay and Zimbabwe?
31 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2017.
How do Uruguay and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
Uruguay ranks 141st and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 153 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Uruguay vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/uruguay/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-square-kilometre/uruguay/zimbabwe/">Uruguay vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
199 places, 7,987 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.