Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cape Verde: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Cape Verde
0.0006 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
2nd
Cape Verde rank
4th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Cape Verde
00.020.040.060.080.1198120022023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0006 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.2 times Cape Verde's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 2nd and Cape Verde ranks 4th of 152 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Cape Verde in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Cape Verde Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0364 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0095 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0268 current US$ per US$ of GDP Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 0.0022 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.003 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0008 current US$ per US$ of GDP Cape Verde
2010s 0.0013 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.001 current US$ per US$ of GDP Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 0.001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Cape Verde?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0006 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Cape Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cape Verde?
0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cape Verde?
29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cape Verde rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 2nd and Cape Verde ranks 4th of 152 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cape Verde: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/cabo-verde/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/cabo-verde/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cape Verde: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 7,861 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.