Late-demographic dividend vs Libya: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per

Late-demographic dividend
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Libya
0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Late-demographic dividend rank
34th
Libya rank
35th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per over time

  • Late-demographic dividend
  • Libya
-00000196319932023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Libya's figure about 15.8 times Late-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Late-demographic dividend ahead.

Late-demographic dividend ranks 34th and Libya ranks 35th of 44 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Late-demographic dividend averaged higher in 4 and Libya in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Late-demographic dividend Libya Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP Late-demographic dividend
1980s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP Late-demographic dividend
1990s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP Late-demographic dividend
2000s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP Late-demographic dividend
2010s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP Libya
2020s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per, Late-demographic dividend or Libya?
Libya, at 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Late-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per between Late-demographic dividend and Libya?
0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and Libya?
41 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2022.
How do Late-demographic dividend and Libya rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria (current us$), per?
Late-demographic dividend ranks 34th and Libya ranks 35th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Late-demographic dividend vs Libya: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/late-demographic-dividend/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/late-demographic-dividend/libya/">Late-demographic dividend vs Libya: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 7,861 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.