Grenada vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria

Grenada
13,182 current US$
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
13,869 current US$
in 2023
Grenada rank
140th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
139th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria over time

  • Grenada
  • Sao Tome and Principe
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k198220022023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 13,869 current US$ against 13,182 current US$ in Grenada, a difference of 687 current US$.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Grenada's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Grenada ahead.

Grenada ranks 140th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 139th of 154 countries.

Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2010s 22,016 current US$ 10,634 current US$ 11,382 current US$ Grenada
2020s 12,183 current US$ 9,549 current US$ 2,634 current US$ Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria, Grenada or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 13,869 current US$ against 13,182 current US$ in Grenada as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria between Grenada and Sao Tome and Principe?
687 current US$, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Sao Tome and Principe?
7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Grenada and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria?
Grenada ranks 140th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 139th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us/grenada/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us/grenada/sao-tome-and-principe/">Grenada vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
200 places, 8,116 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.