Hong Kong (China) vs Namibia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria

Hong Kong (China)
70,000 current US$
in 1996
Namibia
85,039 current US$
in 2023
Hong Kong (China) rank
112th
Namibia rank
109th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria over time

  • Hong Kong (China)
  • Namibia
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196519942023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 85,039 current US$ against 70,000 current US$ in Hong Kong (China), a difference of 15,039 current US$.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Hong Kong (China)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Namibia ahead.

Hong Kong (China) ranks 112th and Namibia ranks 109th of 154 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong (China) averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong (China) Namibia Difference Ahead
1980s 75,000 current US$ 45,000 current US$ 30,000 current US$ Hong Kong (China)
1990s 38,571 current US$ 765,714 current US$ 727,143 current US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria, Hong Kong (China) or Namibia?
Namibia, at 85,039 current US$ against 70,000 current US$ in Hong Kong (China) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria between Hong Kong (China) and Namibia?
15,039 current US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Namibia?
9 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 1996.
How do Hong Kong (China) and Namibia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, austria?
Hong Kong (China) ranks 112th and Namibia ranks 109th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong (China) vs Namibia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us/hong-kong-sar-china/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-austria-current-us/hong-kong-sar-china/namibia/">Hong Kong (China) vs Namibia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
200 places, 8,116 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.