Chile vs Least developed countries: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$)

Chile
20.24 % change on previous year
in 2017
Least developed countries
-13.83 % change on previous year
in 2022
Chile rank
34th
Least developed countries rank
31st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) over time

  • Chile
  • Least developed countries
-1000100200300196619942022

How they compare

Chile currently reports 20.24 % change on previous year against -13.83 % change on previous year in Least developed countries, a difference of 34.07 % change on previous year.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.5 times Least developed countries's.

The two have swapped places 25 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Least developed countries ahead.

Chile ranks 34th and Least developed countries ranks 31st of 138 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Least developed countries in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Least developed countries Difference Ahead
1970s 3.3 % change on previous year 16.22 % change on previous year 12.92 % change on previous year Least developed countries
1980s 13.11 % change on previous year -2.38 % change on previous year 15.49 % change on previous year Chile
1990s 12.48 % change on previous year 0.0632 % change on previous year 12.41 % change on previous year Chile
2000s -4.17 % change on previous year 34.26 % change on previous year 38.43 % change on previous year Least developed countries
2010s -8.85 % change on previous year -0.2572 % change on previous year 8.59 % change on previous year Least developed countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), Chile or Least developed countries?
Chile, at 20.24 % change on previous year against -13.83 % change on previous year in Least developed countries as of 2017.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$) between Chile and Least developed countries?
34.07 % change on previous year, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Least developed countries?
47 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2017.
How do Chile and Least developed countries rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$)?
Chile ranks 34th and Least developed countries ranks 31st of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Least developed countries: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-annual-growth-rate/chile/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-annual-growth-rate/chile/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Chile vs Least developed countries: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 7,292 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.