Belarus vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps over time
- Belarus
- South Sudan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 4,542 current US$ against 2,956 current US$ in South Sudan, a difference of 1,586 current US$.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.5 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2011 it was South Sudan ahead.
Belarus ranks 135th and South Sudan ranks 137th of 151 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 16,727 current US$ | 6.45 million current US$ | 6.44 million current US$ | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 142,250 current US$ | 1.14 million current US$ | 998,828 current US$ | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps, Belarus or South Sudan?
- Belarus, at 4,542 current US$ against 2,956 current US$ in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps between Belarus and South Sudan?
- 1,586 current US$, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and South Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
- How do Belarus and South Sudan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
- Belarus ranks 135th and South Sudan ranks 137th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.