China vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps

China
100,022 current US$
in 2023
Sri Lanka
104,629 current US$
in 2023
China rank
88th
Sri Lanka rank
87th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps over time

  • China
  • Sri Lanka
010.0M20.0M30.0M197019962023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 104,629 current US$ against 100,022 current US$ in China, a difference of 4,607 current US$.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was China ahead.

China ranks 88th and Sri Lanka ranks 87th of 151 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1980s 8.84 million current US$ 599,000 current US$ 8.24 million current US$ China
1990s 6.43 million current US$ 662,000 current US$ 5.77 million current US$ China
2000s -1.08 million current US$ 1.57 million current US$ 2.65 million current US$ Sri Lanka
2010s -2.07 million current US$ 1.12 million current US$ 3.20 million current US$ Sri Lanka
2020s 313,352 current US$ 237,590 current US$ 75,762 current US$ China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps, China or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 104,629 current US$ against 100,022 current US$ in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps between China and Sri Lanka?
4,607 current US$, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sri Lanka?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do China and Sri Lanka rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
China ranks 88th and Sri Lanka ranks 87th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-gaps-filled/china/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-gaps-filled/china/sri-lanka/">China vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 8,426 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.