Cuba vs Hungary: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps
Cuba
582,429 current US$
in 2023
Hungary
450,000 current US$
in 2004
Cuba rank
62nd
Hungary rank
63rd
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps over time
- Cuba
- Hungary
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 582,429 current US$ against 450,000 current US$ in Hungary, a difference of 132,429 current US$.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.3 times Hungary's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Hungary ahead.
Cuba ranks 62nd and Hungary ranks 63rd of 151 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Hungary in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 428,500 current US$ | 1.81 million current US$ | 1.38 million current US$ | Hungary |
| 2000s | 2.72 million current US$ | 352,000 current US$ | 2.37 million current US$ | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps, Cuba or Hungary?
- Cuba, at 582,429 current US$ against 450,000 current US$ in Hungary as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps between Cuba and Hungary?
- 132,429 current US$, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Hungary?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Cuba and Hungary rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
- Cuba ranks 62nd and Hungary ranks 63rd of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.