Cuba vs Lithuania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps
Cuba
582,429 current US$
in 2023
Lithuania
420,000 current US$
in 2004
Cuba rank
62nd
Lithuania rank
65th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps over time
- Cuba
- Lithuania
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 582,429 current US$ against 420,000 current US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 162,429 current US$.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.4 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 62nd and Lithuania ranks 65th of 151 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 492,500 current US$ | 196,875 current US$ | 295,625 current US$ | Cuba |
| 2000s | 2.72 million current US$ | 106,000 current US$ | 2.61 million current US$ | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps, Cuba or Lithuania?
- Cuba, at 582,429 current US$ against 420,000 current US$ in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps between Cuba and Lithuania?
- 162,429 current US$, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Lithuania?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do Cuba and Lithuania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
- Cuba ranks 62nd and Lithuania ranks 65th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.