Estonia vs Laos: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium … Belgium gaps
Estonia
50,000 current US$
in 2004
Laos
42,326 current US$
in 2019
Estonia rank
97th
Laos rank
100th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium … Belgium gaps over time
- Estonia
- Laos
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 50,000 current US$ against 42,326 current US$ in Laos, a difference of 7,674 current US$.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.2 times Laos's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Laos has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 97th and Laos ranks 100th of 151 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 145,000 current US$ | 2.55 million current US$ | 2.41 million current US$ | Laos |
| 2000s | 86,000 current US$ | 3.32 million current US$ | 3.23 million current US$ | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps, Estonia or Laos?
- Estonia, at 50,000 current US$ against 42,326 current US$ in Laos as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps between Estonia and Laos?
- 7,674 current US$, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Laos?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2004.
- How do Estonia and Laos rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
- Estonia ranks 97th and Laos ranks 100th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.