Estonia vs Suriname: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps
Estonia
50,000 current US$
in 2004
Suriname
50,796 current US$
in 2023
Estonia rank
97th
Suriname rank
95th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps over time
- Estonia
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 50,796 current US$ against 50,000 current US$ in Estonia, a difference of 796 current US$.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 97th and Suriname ranks 95th of 151 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 145,000 current US$ | 3.77 million current US$ | 3.63 million current US$ | Suriname |
| 2000s | 86,000 current US$ | 1.15 million current US$ | 1.07 million current US$ | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps, Estonia or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 50,796 current US$ against 50,000 current US$ in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps between Estonia and Suriname?
- 796 current US$, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Suriname?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2004.
- How do Estonia and Suriname rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
- Estonia ranks 97th and Suriname ranks 95th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.