Hong Kong, China vs Namibia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Namibia
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 50,000 current US$ against 42,593 current US$ in Namibia, a difference of 7,407 current US$.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 97th and Namibia ranks 99th of 151 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 20,000 current US$ | 40,000 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | Namibia |
| 1990s | 72,857 current US$ | 920,000 current US$ | 847,143 current US$ | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps, Hong Kong, China or Namibia?
- Hong Kong, China, at 50,000 current US$ against 42,593 current US$ in Namibia as of 1996.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps between Hong Kong, China and Namibia?
- 7,407 current US$, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Namibia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 1996.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Namibia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 97th and Namibia ranks 99th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.