Hungary vs Lithuania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps over time
- Hungary
- Lithuania
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 450,000 current US$ against 420,000 current US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 30,000 current US$.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 63rd and Lithuania ranks 65th of 151 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.79 million current US$ | 196,875 current US$ | 1.60 million current US$ | Hungary |
| 2000s | 352,000 current US$ | 106,000 current US$ | 246,000 current US$ | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps, Hungary or Lithuania?
- Hungary, at 450,000 current US$ against 420,000 current US$ in Lithuania as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps between Hungary and Lithuania?
- 30,000 current US$, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Lithuania?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do Hungary and Lithuania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
- Hungary ranks 63rd and Lithuania ranks 65th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.