Kosovo vs Uzbekistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps over time
- Kosovo
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 5,038 current US$ against 4,758 current US$ in Kosovo, a difference of 280 current US$.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Kosovo's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kosovo ahead.
Kosovo ranks 133rd and Uzbekistan ranks 132nd of 151 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kosovo averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 45,150 current US$ | 7,591 current US$ | 37,559 current US$ | Kosovo |
| 2020s | 7,010 current US$ | 146,429 current US$ | 139,420 current US$ | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps, Kosovo or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 5,038 current US$ against 4,758 current US$ in Kosovo as of 2021.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps between Kosovo and Uzbekistan?
- 280 current US$, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Uzbekistan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
- How do Kosovo and Uzbekistan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
- Kosovo ranks 133rd and Uzbekistan ranks 132nd of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.