Latvia vs Mauritius: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps over time
- Latvia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 90,000 current US$ against 60,000 current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 30,000 current US$.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.5 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 92nd and Mauritius ranks 89th of 151 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 257,500 current US$ | 475,000 current US$ | 217,500 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 44,000 current US$ | 500,000 current US$ | 456,000 current US$ | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps, Latvia or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 90,000 current US$ against 60,000 current US$ in Latvia as of 2006.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps between Latvia and Mauritius?
- 30,000 current US$, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mauritius?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2004.
- How do Latvia and Mauritius rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
- Latvia ranks 92nd and Mauritius ranks 89th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.