Lithuania vs Nepal: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps over time
- Lithuania
- Nepal
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 420,000 current US$ against 339,536 current US$ in Nepal, a difference of 80,464 current US$.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.2 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 65th and Nepal ranks 67th of 151 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 196,875 current US$ | 622,500 current US$ | 425,625 current US$ | Nepal |
| 2000s | 106,000 current US$ | 670,000 current US$ | 564,000 current US$ | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps, Lithuania or Nepal?
- Lithuania, at 420,000 current US$ against 339,536 current US$ in Nepal as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps between Lithuania and Nepal?
- 80,464 current US$, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Nepal?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do Lithuania and Nepal rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
- Lithuania ranks 65th and Nepal ranks 67th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.