Lithuania vs Serbia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps over time
- Lithuania
- Serbia
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 420,000 current US$ against 343,039 current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 76,961 current US$.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.2 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Serbia ahead.
Lithuania ranks 65th and Serbia ranks 66th of 151 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 195,833 current US$ | 823,333 current US$ | 627,500 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2000s | 106,000 current US$ | 13.66 million current US$ | 13.56 million current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps, Lithuania or Serbia?
- Lithuania, at 420,000 current US$ against 343,039 current US$ in Serbia as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps between Lithuania and Serbia?
- 76,961 current US$, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Serbia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2004.
- How do Lithuania and Serbia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
- Lithuania ranks 65th and Serbia ranks 66th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.