Low & middle income vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps

Low & middle income
1.39 billion current US$
in 2023
Rwanda
38.32 million current US$
in 2023
Low & middle income rank
2nd
Rwanda rank
3rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps over time

  • Low & middle income
  • Rwanda
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B196019912023

How they compare

Low & middle income currently reports 1.39 billion current US$ against 38.32 million current US$ in Rwanda, a difference of 1.36 billion current US$.

That makes Low & middle income's figure about 36.4 times Rwanda's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Low & middle income has been ahead every year.

Low & middle income ranks 2nd and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 44 groups.

Low & middle income has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low & middle income Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 77.60 million current US$ 6.89 million current US$ 70.71 million current US$ Low & middle income
1970s 220.93 million current US$ 22.44 million current US$ 198.49 million current US$ Low & middle income
1980s 347.68 million current US$ 26.62 million current US$ 321.06 million current US$ Low & middle income
1990s 488.84 million current US$ 32.03 million current US$ 456.81 million current US$ Low & middle income
2000s 1.08 billion current US$ 34.16 million current US$ 1.05 billion current US$ Low & middle income
2010s 1.41 billion current US$ 47.66 million current US$ 1.36 billion current US$ Low & middle income
2020s 1.30 billion current US$ 48.00 million current US$ 1.25 billion current US$ Low & middle income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps, Low & middle income or Rwanda?
Low & middle income, at 1.39 billion current US$ against 38.32 million current US$ in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps between Low & middle income and Rwanda?
1.36 billion current US$, with Low & middle income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Rwanda?
64 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2023.
How do Low & middle income and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
Low & middle income ranks 2nd and Rwanda ranks 3rd of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low & middle income vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-gaps-filled/low-and-middle-income/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-gaps-filled/low-and-middle-income/rwanda/">Low & middle income vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 8,426 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.