Montenegro vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps over time
- Montenegro
- Uruguay
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 1,595 current US$ against 1,127 current US$ in Uruguay, a difference of 468 current US$.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.4 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Uruguay ahead.
Montenegro ranks 142nd and Uruguay ranks 144th of 151 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40,000 current US$ | 43,333 current US$ | 3,333 current US$ | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 49,113 current US$ | 27,848 current US$ | 21,265 current US$ | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps, Montenegro or Uruguay?
- Montenegro, at 1,595 current US$ against 1,127 current US$ in Uruguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps between Montenegro and Uruguay?
- 468 current US$, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Uruguay?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2017.
- How do Montenegro and Uruguay rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
- Montenegro ranks 142nd and Uruguay ranks 144th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.