Pakistan vs East Timor: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium … Belgium gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium … Belgium gaps over time
- Pakistan
- East Timor
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 28,763 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in East Timor, a difference of 8,763 current US$.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.4 times East Timor's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1993 it was East Timor ahead.
Pakistan ranks 105th and East Timor ranks 107th of 151 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -724,286 current US$ | 1.10 million current US$ | 1.83 million current US$ | East Timor |
| 2000s | 350,000 current US$ | 3.33 million current US$ | 2.98 million current US$ | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps, Pakistan or East Timor?
- Pakistan, at 28,763 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in East Timor as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps between Pakistan and East Timor?
- 8,763 current US$, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and East Timor?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2005.
- How do Pakistan and East Timor rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
- Pakistan ranks 105th and East Timor ranks 107th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.