Serbia vs Tajikistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps over time
- Serbia
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 343,039 current US$ against 320,000 current US$ in Tajikistan, a difference of 23,039 current US$.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Tajikistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 66th and Tajikistan ranks 69th of 151 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 886,000 current US$ | 115,000 current US$ | 771,000 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2000s | 5.88 million current US$ | 175,000 current US$ | 5.70 million current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps, Serbia or Tajikistan?
- Serbia, at 343,039 current US$ against 320,000 current US$ in Tajikistan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps between Serbia and Tajikistan?
- 23,039 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Tajikistan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2009.
- How do Serbia and Tajikistan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), gaps?
- Serbia ranks 66th and Tajikistan ranks 69th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) with 345 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.