South Asia (IDA & IBRD) vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per

South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
0.0035 current US$ per person
in 2022
Tanzania
0.1446 current US$ per person
in 2023
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank
41st
Tanzania rank
38th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per over time

  • South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
  • Tanzania
00.511.52196719952023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 0.1446 current US$ per person against 0.0035 current US$ per person in South Asia (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 0.1411 current US$ per person.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 41.3 times South Asia (IDA & IBRD)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ahead.

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 41st and Tanzania ranks 38th of 44 groups.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Asia (IDA & IBRD) Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0223 current US$ per person 0.0775 current US$ per person 0.0552 current US$ per person Tanzania
1980s 0.0091 current US$ per person 0.1828 current US$ per person 0.1737 current US$ per person Tanzania
1990s 0.0026 current US$ per person 0.6077 current US$ per person 0.6051 current US$ per person Tanzania
2000s 0.0098 current US$ per person 0.5107 current US$ per person 0.5009 current US$ per person Tanzania
2010s 0.0105 current US$ per person 0.3291 current US$ per person 0.3185 current US$ per person Tanzania
2020s 0.0033 current US$ per person 0.1984 current US$ per person 0.1952 current US$ per person Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per, South Asia (IDA & IBRD) or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 0.1446 current US$ per person against 0.0035 current US$ per person in South Asia (IDA & IBRD) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per between South Asia (IDA & IBRD) and Tanzania?
0.1411 current US$ per person, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Asia (IDA & IBRD) and Tanzania?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do South Asia (IDA & IBRD) and Tanzania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 41st and Tanzania ranks 38th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-capita/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-belgium-current-us-per-capita/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/tanzania/">South Asia (IDA & IBRD) vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 8,081 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.